Last week I commented on the excellent post about RipOff Report done by Sara Bird.  She had a great follow-up this week.  RipOff Report's attorney tries to explain how the headlines allegedly written by its users are so packed with keywords and why the posts could not have been created by RipOff Report's employees.  The explanations for the keyword laden headlines - 1) its users are SEO experts, 2) thats how people write then they are mad, and 3) its users are uneducated and just write like that. Does anyone find these arguments hard to believe and/or inconsistent?

ROR's attorney also argues that the posts could not have been written by RipOff Report employees because the IP addresses don't match.   Seems a little lame coming from an attorney who works for an Internet based company.  There are times when some attorneys make you want to deny your profession.  Fortunately others like Sara Bird make up for them.  I recommend Sara's follow-up.